p233 [G Biava] [To the same.] [From the Italian.] DEAR BROTHER, - I have no place after Ryde. I did indeed think of going to New Zealand, but our brother Mr. Wigram is to go there on the 25th instant; it is therefore possible that I may not go, but I am not sure about it. If not, I shall probably go to the United States, but not before next summer; I hope meanwhile to visit the north of England, and perhaps Scotland. I may go to Italy possibly, but I cannot say just now.

As to the question: the Old Testament saints were born of God, but they could not call themselves children of God, because, redemption not being accomplished, the Spirit of adoption was not given; they could not take that position. The word is clear on this point. This is the force of John 1:12. Those who, through grace, being born of God, received Christ, received right (authority) to take the position of children. Also the Epistle to the Galatians explains the difference fully and clearly, "The heir, as long as he is a child, differs nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all. … But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth His Son … that we might receive the adoption [of sons]. And because ye are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father." (Gal. 4:1-7.) "Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son"; then (Gal. 3:26) "Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus." The difference between saints under the old covenant and Christians is therefore clearly explained in the word.

You must not be frightened at the large number at Ryde: we were from 500 to 600 at Manchester; if we are 1,000 (of which I am not at all sure) at Ryde, the difference is not much. In both cases it is not really a conference, but lectures (discourses). I use the opportunity to see many brethren; the truth also is spread amongst many.

Your affectionate brother.

July, 1873.

[52141I]