p119 Dear F G Patterson, - My feeling is to let it work itself out. Some who spoke to me were really true in heart. And any others I have known will not, as to discipline, recognise the unity of the body. I should hold fast to this. … If unity as to discipline be not owned, we are independent churches. When H.B. asked me what was to be done, I said, Bethesda judged or honestly separated from, that is, no one should go there and the meeting openly disowned unless they repented - guarantee for sound doctrine - and the unity of the body owned. But their anxiety is for outward adhesion, and such that the worldly camp can be more or less owned. I have no desire for that - all Christians individually surely owned who walk uprightly. A vast amount of the evangelisation has been by and in connection with brethren, and some of the most efficient are very strong upon the point.

There are those who act in this movement who are, I think, deliberately unfaithful - I mean by that, who deliberately take an unfaithful path for convenience, some who spoke to me in [Dublin] preferred an evil course. I think in the leaders there is the pretension of a successful revival movement; they will find their level. This has no attraction for me, but there are those who are simple and perplexed by the wickedness of the Bethesdaites.

I feel my part is to remain perfectly quiet and let the Lord work. My conviction is that the movers have not a good conscience, and seek to cover their position under the plea of unity and charity. I am far from pretending brethren have not failed in many things: I do not doubt they have; and therefore it becomes them to go softly, but I have no wish to get into the camp.

Affectionately yours in the Lord.

London, March 18th, 1871.

[52070E]