stempublishing.com : J. N. Darby : Synopsis : Lamentations : Chapter 3 | Next chapter |
Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Summary |
The Spirit of Christ in the remnant, suffering for the testimony and for its rejectionIn Lamentations 3 we find the language of faith, of sorrowing faith, of the Spirit of Christ in the remnant, on the occasion of the judgment of Jerusalem in which God had dwelt. Before, the prophet (or the Spirit of Christ in him) spoke in the name of Jerusalem, deploring her sufferings and confessing her sin, while appealing to Jehovah against her enemies, relating what He had done in forsaking His sanctuary, and (from Lam. 2:11) expressing the depth of her affliction at the sight of the evil. But in chapter 3 he places himself in the midst of the evil to express the sentiments of the Spirit of Christ; not, it is true, in an absolute manner, according to the perfection of Christ Himself, but as acting in the heart of the prophet (as is generally the case in Jeremiah), expressing his personal distress — a distress produced by the Spirit, but clothed in the feelings of the prophet's own heart — to bring out that which practically was going on in the heart of a faithful Israelite, the reality of that which was most elevated in that day of anguish and affliction, in which alas! there was no more hope from the people's side than from that of the enemies who attacked them, and in which the heart of the faithful suffered without hope of remedy, yet much more on account of a people who hearkened not to the voice of Jehovah, than on account of enemies raised up in judgment. What has Christ not suffered! That which His Spirit produces in the midst of human weakness, He has Himself undergone and felt in its full extent; only that He was perfect in all that His heart went through in His affliction.
In chapter 3 the prophet expresses then in his own person, by the
Spirit of Christ, all that he felt as sharing the affliction of
Israel, and being at the same time the object of their enmity — a
position remarkably analogous to that of Christ. What suffering can
be like that of one who shares the suffering of God's people without
being able to turn away the evil, because they refuse to hear God's
message — like that of one who bears this affliction on his heart
with the feeling that, if this foolish people would but have
hearkened, the wrath of God should have been turned away? It was the
lamentation of Christ Himself, "Oh, if thou hadst known,"
etc. In the main Jeremiah partook of the same feelings. But we see
him more as being of the people, and participating in his own person
in the consequences of the evil, seeing himself under these
consequences with the people, because they had rejected his
testimony. This may be said of the Lord at the close of His life, or
on the cross. But we see that this sentiment, a little known in the
case of Job, takes here the form of a personal prayer, complaining
of personal suffering. Jeremiah suffers for the testimony, and for
the rejection of the testimony. The first nineteen verses of
chapter 3 contain the expression of this state. It is altogether the
spirit of the remnant; and, with the exception of the sentiment I
have just mentioned, it is that expressed in many of the
Psalms. Into it all indeed, if we go on to the cross,* Christ
Himself entered. Turning in faith to the One who smites
The prophet speaks as having borne in his own heart the deep
grief of that which Jehovah had brought upon Jerusalem; but
feeling it as one who knew God to be his God, so that he could
experience what it was to be the object of the wrath of God. He
suffered with Jerusalem, and he suffered for Jerusalem. But the
truth of this relation with Jehovah, while making him feel the
affliction more deeply, sustained him also (v. 22). He begins to
feel that, after all, it is better to have to do with Jehovah,
although, in another point of view, this made it all the more
painful. He feels that it is good to be afflicted, and to wait
upon Jehovah who smites: for He will not cast off for ever. He
does not afflict willingly, but from necessity. Why complain of
the chastening of sin? It were better to turn unto Jehovah.*
He encourages Israel to do so, and while remembering the
affliction of his weeping people, faith is in exercise until
Jehovah shall interpose. It is well that an affliction like this
should be felt; the only harm is when it is allowed to weaken
confidence in the Lord. Having been succoured himself, the prophet can assure others of God's kindness
The prophet calls to mind the affliction of Jerusalem, and,
remembering the way which he had been succoured himself, he makes
use of the kindness he had experienced to confirm his assurance
that God would shew the same kindness to the people. But with
respect to the proud and careless who reject the truth, their
enmity against God, manifesting itself in their enmity against
those who were the bearers of His word, he asks for the judgment
of God upon them.* Thus relieved in spirit, and his heart
filled with the sentiment that, since the evil came from Jehovah,
that which gave so much depth to the sorrow was also a comfort to
the heart, he can return to the affliction itself, measuring its
whole extent, which the anguish of his soul prevented his
apprehending till he had been able to arrive at its true
source. Now he can enter into details, although with deep grief,
yet with more calmness because His heart is with God. The sense of
trouble and distress at the thought of God's judgment falling on
those whom He loves is not sinful, although in Jeremiah's case his
heart sometimes failed him. Christ's profound distress at God's judgmentIt is right to be troubled, and, as it were, overwhelmed, at God's breaking, not perhaps the relationship, but His present connection with that which was the object of His favour, that which bore the name and the testimony of God. Christ felt this for Himself, though in Him distress went much farther: "Now is my soul troubled, and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour." Only in Christ all is perfect; and if He feels in perfection the profound distress of the object of God's love becoming the object of His judgment, a feeling of unparalleled grief, seeing it at the same time according to the perfection of God's ways, He can say, "For this cause came I unto this hour; Father, glorify thy name!" He was Himself the necessary object of all God's affection, and consequently (if the judgment was to glorify God) the object also of a perfect judgment, that is, of a complete forsaking on God's part. That which is dreadful in this thought is, that the change of relative position was absolute and perfect in His case according to the very perfection of the relationship. He suffered the forsaking of God, instead of enjoying infinite favour which He knew. The difference between the place of Jeremiah and that of the perfect Man — ChristThere was something similar in the case of Jerusalem; and Jeremiah, feeling by the Spirit of Christ the preciousness of this relationship, and entering into it as sharing it, he suffers with that which was thus judged of God. Only, although moved by the Spirit of Christ, he must find the equilibrium of his thoughts, he must seek Jehovah to bring Him into the affliction, amidst all his personal grief, and the true but human workings of a heart that was shaken and cast down by the circumstances. He attached himself to Jerusalem, as resting on her position before God, and not solely and absolutely for God, and as God Himself, as did our blessed Lord. There was an object between his soul and God (an object beloved also by God), and it was not loved absolutely in God, and with the affection of God, and hence the affliction had to reach this object, he being in it and of it, reach his heart in this place — and then God draw it to Himself, so that he may look at all from Jehovah's view of it. But Christ was Himself absolutely in the place, for God's glory and the salvation of others. The judged thing from which He was infinitely far, even as man, he was to be before God. Ever perfect, He learned to the absolute fulness what it was to be this before God, and glorified God there. But this, though we know it true, none can fathom. There was in Jeremiah the right foundation, and he finds Jehovah, first of all in spite of the affliction, but soon in the affliction itself, and he recovers himself immediately, not from the affliction, but in the affliction, by the power of God. Christ can say, "How often would I have gathered," etc. This was the affection of God. Jeremiah confesses sin, and ought to confess it, as himself in the place, though a testimony of God in it. But this thought changes so far the character of the feeling (see Lam. 1:19-20). Christ sought for nothing as a resource, as if self were concerned in it. His affliction was unmixed and absolute to Himself alone, more profound (for who could share it?) but perfect as being His alone. Thus, in John 12, when it is Himself personally (for this Gospel sets the old vine aside as rejected), He cannot desire that the hour of God's forsaking should come; He ought to fear and be troubled, and He was therefore heard. But it is between God and Himself alone. No other thought comes in between — it is wholly with God. Alas! had it been possible, all was lost. But no; it is the absolute submission of the perfect man, who seeks (and seeks nothing else) that the name of God may be glorified according to God's perfection; that at all cost to Himself God's name may be glorified. Not now as God, who must necessarily maintain its glory, but as one who submits to everything, who sacrifices Himself, in order that God may glorify His name. For this cause He has been supremely glorified as man — a glorious mystery, in which the glory of God will shine forth throughout eternity. |
Previous chapter | Index | Next chapter |